Skip to main content

                                                                                

logo

  • Home
  • About
      1. SANH Rationale
      2. SANH Governance
      3. SANH Structure
      4. SANH Vision
      5. Hub Network
  • Our Research
      1. Work Packages
      2. SANH Achievements
      3. Equitable Partnerships
      4. Gender Equality
        1. Gender Equality Action Plan
        2. Gender Equality in SANH
  • News & Events
      1. News
      2. Events
      3. SANH Training
      4. Newsletters
  • Policy resources
  • Publications
  • Project Partners

Work Package 2.1a

Work Package 2.1a

1

About:
WP2.1a conducts experimental testing of agronomic and genetic solutions, with a focus on NUE, profitability and yield (amount & quality). The approach explores tailored solutions to local problems, but with a standardised protocol for experimentation and analysis. Trials will be established at 9 research centres in AFG, BGD, IND, LKA, NPL and PAK to optimise synergies. A key challenge is to go beyond Neem Coated Urea (mandatory in India since 2015), which reduces N2O and NO3- losses but has been found to increase NH3 emissions (NEWS VJC). Chemical urease inhibitors will be tested followed by a search for more socially-acceptable plant-based inhibitors, while urea deep placement, plus better use of legumes, green manures and livestock excreta all offer opportunities (e.g.15). Full N budgets will be established for contrasting soils and climates, extending 15N protocols for N2O/N2 ratio and novel NH3 flux methods, linked to harvest outcomes to build farmer confidence.

Work package level Specific objectives:

  • Quantify the fate of applied nitrogen fertilisers within typical farm systems across SE Asia, partitioning these between the crop, soil and losses from the system.
  • Working with WP2.2 to develop locally-based mitigation treatments that can be compared within plot-based experiments.
  • Quantify the magnitude and timing of N loss between different pathways and determine crop NUE achieved by different mitigation options.
  • Develop an annual N budget for different experimental manipulations within cropping systems studied indicating the magnitude of change that can be achieved by management interventions.

Work package level-specific questions or hypotheses:

  • What changes to current agricultural practice in the region would be most likely to improve NUE and reduce losses of N?
  • What is the effect on crop yield and quality of agronomic interventions aimed at improving NUE and reducing N losses?
  • How do N loss processes respond to changing rates of N input?
  • How much nitrogen can be supplied from the soil without addition of N fertilisers?
  • How are losses of N partitioned between different pathways in response to management approaches, and are there environmental tradeoffs that may result from such altered management?
  • What changes in the greenhouse gas and nitrogen balances can be achieved by agronomic management aimed at improving NUE
  • On the basis of plot-level experiments can improvements to local fertiliser recommendations be provided?

Work Package Leads:

  • Bhatia (IARI) 
  • Rees (SRUC)

Partners:

  • CEH
  • University of Edinburgh
  • SRUC
  • Rothamsted Research
  • BRRI
  • University of Rajshahi
  • University of Perideniya
  • IARI
  • BSMRAU
  • University of Faisalabad
  • NRRI
  • IAAS
  • CFA
  • NFDC

Tweets by GCRFNitrogenHub

Privacy Policy

Term of Use

Gender Equality Statement

Footer menu

  • Contact

Search form